There is a moment most of us know.
The check is written. The button is clicked. The fee is paid. And something in the chest releases — a loosening, a lightening, the quiet relief of an account brought back to zero.
And then, in another form, in another season, sometimes in another life, the moment returns. Because the relief was real. But the resolution was rented.
We know, somewhere beneath that relief, that the thing we caused is still out there. The thing we saw and kept walking. The boundary we crossed because no one was watching. The friend we maneuvered around. The body we kept medicating instead of listening to. The people whose displacement we funded rather than prevented.
We know.
This is what happens when the systems we live inside are architected around the transaction rather than the transformation. When the booth is always open. When the fee is always posted. When absolution is always available. The harm continues, unnamed now, filed somewhere we chose not to look.
There is a practice in the Catholic tradition: confession. You enter, you name the harm, you receive absolution, you leave clean. The slate feels cleared. We accept the feeling as fact. Until next Sunday.
The priest is not deceived. The penitent is not lying. The sacrament is functioning as intended. What the sacrament cannot do, what it was never designed to do, is change what you do when you leave the booth.
The ledger balances. The behavior continues.
Now consider a different system. Alcoholics Anonymous does not offer absolution. It offers something harder: the demand that behavior change. The twelve steps are not a transaction. They are a reckoning. You do not pay your way through them. You do not receive a certificate at the end. What you receive, if the work is done honestly, is a person who no longer does the thing that caused the harm.
The ledger in AA is not the work. The behavior is the work. And the work is never done alone.
Two systems. The same human problem. Opposite answers to the same question: when harm is caused, what does resolution actually require?
One says: name it, pay it, receive forgiveness, continue.
The other says: the only resolution is the one that changes what happens next.
The confession booth is not the problem with Catholicism. It is what happens when any system, religious, financial, or governmental, is asked to resolve what only changed behavior can.
We have built most of our institutions on the first answer. We have applied it to land, to the body, and to belonging.
Land
Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the federal government operates an in-lieu fee mitigation program. Cause damage to a jurisdictional waterway or wetland. Pay a designated third party. The federal obligation is resolved.
The booth is open. The fee is posted.
Whether the land recovers is a separate question. The ledger doesn’t ask it.
The same architecture structures carbon markets. A corporation continues its emissions. Somewhere else, in Vermont, the Amazon basin, the Global South, land is taken offline, sequestered, credited in perpetuity. The ton of carbon on the ledger is treated as equivalent to the ton of carbon in the atmosphere. One keeps producing. The other accounted for once and forever. The behavior does not change. The ledger balances.
Confession. Absolution. Return.
What the ledger cannot hold: the communities living inside the sequestered land. The working forests. The people whose relationship to place gets financialized into an offset for someone else’s accumulation. The carbon may be equivalent on paper. The displacement is not equivalent to anything.
Source: EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Final Compensatory Mitigation Rule, Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 70, April 10, 2008.
Body
The market arrives before the diagnosis. A feeling gets a name. A name gets a drug. A drug gets a commercial that ends with ask your doctor. You didn’t know you had a problem until the infrastructure for solving it was already in place.
Then you arrive at the doctor’s office. Already guilty. Already wrong. The confession booth was built before you knew you had anything to confess.
The system is structured to treat the presenting condition. The confession is the diagnosis. The absolution is the prescription. The booth resets every appointment.
The patient arrives. The patient returns. The conditions that produced the illness, the food system, the economic pressure, the chronic stress of living in a body the market has opinions about, remain outside the transaction. Legible to everyone. Addressed by no one.
The pharmaceutical response to side effects follows the same logic. A medication produces a side effect. Another medication addresses the side effect. Each entry in the ledger is real. What accumulates is management of consequence rather than resolution of cause.
The body absorbs what the transaction cannot resolve. The sacrament repeats. The booth resets.
Belonging
A nation participates in the destabilization of a region, through policy, through arms, through the accumulated weight of economic extraction. Displacement follows. People lose not just their homes but the web of relation, language, history, and place that constitutes belonging.
The response is humanitarian funding. Camps are built. Aid is delivered. The ledger of moral responsibility is addressed through the ledger of financial contribution.
What the funding does not address: the conditions that produced the displacement. The policy continues. The camp becomes permanent. The people inside it are administered rather than restored. Their belonging, the specific irreplaceable texture of a particular place and community, does not appear anywhere in the accounting.
The relief of the donor is structural, not felt. The rules say the ledger balances. The system grants permission to stop looking. The harm continues. Somewhere beneath the permission, the knowing does too.
The heart holds the record
The relief is temporary. The relief that expires keeps the transaction loop intact.
The guilt is not incidental. It is the raw material, the energy source the system runs on. But the guilt didn’t arrive first. The market did. The awareness of harm was cultivated after the infrastructure for selling the relief was already in place.
The systems didn’t create the guilt. They created a market for it.
And here is what the market does: it converts guilt into the illusion of innocence. Not innocence itself — innocence is not available for purchase. The transaction produces the feeling of innocence while the underlying condition remains. The harm doesn’t disappear. It goes quiet, until the toll comes around again, in another form, in another season, as it always does.
The confession booth and the carbon credit perform the same function. The ledger shows the transaction. The transaction feels like resolution. The harm continues, now unnamed, now laundered into legitimacy.
AA was built on a different premise. Guilt without changed behavior is not accountability. It is a subscription service. You pay the fee, you receive the relief, you return next week. The fee goes up. The harm accumulates. The booth remains open.
What the booth cannot reach is the heart. The place where the knowing lives that no transaction can quiet permanently. The 3am place. The place that remembers what the ledger filed away.
What we recognize
All of us reading this have participated in one of these systems. Have bought the offset, taken the medication, donated to the fund. Participation is not always a choice. The systems are the water we swim in. But awareness of the water is.
All of us have also, at some point, been the place where the unresolved harm landed. Have been the community asked to absorb what the transaction moved but did not resolve. Have felt the difference between the ledger and the lived reality.
The recognition that lives between those two experiences is not comfortable. It is not supposed to be.
The real question is not what the transaction cost. It is what changed behavior would require. What we would have to see differently. What we would have to stop pretending the confession booth resolved.
That question is not an indictment. It is an invitation.
The systems will keep the booth open. That part is not in our hands.
What is in our hands: finding the people who have also chosen to stop looking away. Who are willing to ask what changed behavior actually requires. Who will sit with you in the gap between the ledger and the lived reality and help you find your way back to alignment with what you actually value.
That is not a small thing. It is, in fact, the whole thing.
Be still. Look.
Once you see it, be with it.
Adjust your behavior through your own discernment, not by outsourcing to the system.
Enjoy the sweetness of living an aligned life.
Source: EPA and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Final Compensatory Mitigation Rule, Federal Register Vol. 73, No. 70, April 10, 2008.
If you find yourself reading, learning, or citing this work please consider supporting it with a Substack subscription (https://alexsys.substack.com/subscribe) or Ko-fi (https://ko-fi.com/alexsysthompson)
As usual your writing has explained this perfectly. Selling carbon credits is a shell game of sorts. Blame just shifts by pretending to buy your way out. I confess, so I'm absolved. Yet I continue the same bad habits for another week. There is no place for this in Vermont.
What I keep coming back to is that this moment is making something impossible to unsee. The institutions many of us were taught to trust are showing us their bones. Not their mission statements. Not their public-facing virtue. Their bones. And maybe that is the terrible clarity we needed. We are watching, in real time, what happens when systems are built to preserve power more efficiently than they protect people. That does not mean nothing good has ever come from them. It means we have to stop confusing access to a system with actual care.
To me, this is the fork in the road. We can keep paying the toll and pinning all our hope on one election cycle, or we can start behaving like people who understand that belonging is a practice and survival is communal. That does not mean abandoning federal responsibility. It means refusing to outsource our moral imagination to systems too bulky, captured and indifferent to hold us. I think the shift toward younger, more progressive, more interdependent politics is really a hunger for a different architecture: smaller rooms, mutual care, local accountability, shared resources and communities that take care of each other before crisis becomes catastrophe. Not innocence. Not absolution. Changed behavior.